As many of you know, with New York State set to vote on same-sex marriage this year, I've been eating up all things marriage equality. So when I saw this parody video of the infamous "gathering storm" video, I had to smile.
Funny, no? Have you seen any other parodies that made you smile? And did you see the story about the hilariously unfortunate acronym for the anti-marriage group?
Showing posts with label marriage equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marriage equality. Show all posts
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Good news this morning!
New York's Governor Patterson is supposed to introduce a bill on same-sex marriage today. While I was hoping that Albany will do the courageous thing, I was reminded me of how much I love this video from the courage campaign:
"Fidelity": Don't Divorce... from Courage Campaign on Vimeo.
(sniff, sniff) What's that? No, I'm not tearing up.....
"Fidelity": Don't Divorce... from Courage Campaign on Vimeo.
(sniff, sniff) What's that? No, I'm not tearing up.....
Labels:
albany,
gay marriage,
love,
marriage equality,
patterson
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Wall Street Journal on Choice
Stephanie Simon has an interesting piece in the Wall Street Journal today on the future of the anti-choice movement. File this under good and bad news -- she reports that many anti-choicers are moving more towards a platform of reconciliation, choosing to focus more on pregnancy prevention than on criminalizing abortion.
The bad news? She reports that:
Sigh. So while I'm all for people finally approaching reproductive rights from a sensible standpoint that puts the health of women first, the implication that it has to be at the expense of someone else's rights makes me sad.
The bad news? She reports that:
"With state courts continually resetting the rules, gay marriage feels more fresh and urgent to voters than abortion, which has settled into a status quo that polls show a large number of Americans can accept."
Sigh. So while I'm all for people finally approaching reproductive rights from a sensible standpoint that puts the health of women first, the implication that it has to be at the expense of someone else's rights makes me sad.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)